Potentiation Electromagnetic Repatterning

Resetting the Bioenergy Blueprint via DNA

After mapping the bioenergy blueprint, we realized we had to find a way to press its “reset button.”

It was at this stage we began to understand that the nervous system was never meant to repattern the human bioenergy blueprint; that only sound-activated DNA can permanently restore bioenergetic harmony; and that therefore, some other method of initiating repatterning besides stimulation of the nervous system had to be found.

We went to DNA because it was the obvious choice. DNA contains our genetic codes and is the master blueprint for our biology. It literally creates us through a protein-assembly process known as “transcription.”

To transcribe is to copy in writing, to produce in written form, or to arrange music for a different instrument. In other words, we come into being, at our molecular level, through a process with striking affinities to “composition.”

It is extremely interesting to consider the privileged place of song, storytelling and words in creation myths. Anyone who has undertaken a comparative study of religions probably has been struck by the universal role of sound and language in such myths.

Genesis 1:3 relates, “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.” In the New Testament John states, “In the beginning was the Word,” an idea paralleled in the Vedas where we read, “In the beginning was Brahman with whom was the Word.”

The ancient Egyptians similarly believed that the god-men Thoth and Ra created life through language, just as the Popol Vuh from the Mayan tradition insists that the first humans were brought into existence by speech.

Consistent with this language-based cosmology, the healing tradition immortalized in Finland’s Bock Saga is based on memorization and utterance of sacred sounds.

This Saga, which Dr. Horowitz describes at length, is an elaboration of a time-honored oral technology employing sound and light based on a “spiritual understanding of how to work with ‘nature orally’”—or “naturally.”

“Here, in ancient mythology,” writes Horowitz, “is the relationship between genesis, genetics, and the spoken word. Also implied is the concept of wholistic health hinging on oral functions.”

Horowitz points out that neurophysiologists have determined that fully

one-third of the sensory-motor cortex of the brain is devoted to the tongue, oral cavity, the lips, and speech. In other words, oral frequency emissions (i.e., bioacoustic tones) spoken, or sung, exert powerful control over life, vibrating genes that influence total well-being and even evolution of the species.

Since the start of the Human Genome Project, there has been a tendency even in mainstream science to regard DNA as the alphabet through which we are written into existence.

Another metaphor helpful in understanding genetic composition also derives from language. DNA’s alphabet is composed of four basic “letters” (nucleobases) that combine to form sixty-four different “words” (nucleotides) used to build a virtually limitless number of “sentences” (genes).

Leigh and I realized that if we were to activate what we saw as an extraordinary latent potential in DNA, one perhaps capable of transforming both consciousness and physiology we intuited along with a growing number of researchers, we had to find or develop a way to access DNA without laboratories or test tubes.

But how do you activate DNA without physically manipulating it?

At this stage, we were fortunate to be given a copy of The Cosmic Serpent: DNA and the Origins of Knowledge, by French anthropologist Jeremy Narby.

Dr. Narby spent years studying the healing techniques of shamans (medicine men) in the Amazon. His riveting account was particularly helpful in developing the Regenetics Method.

In one telling passage, Narby writes that

DNA is not merely an informational molecule, but … also a form of text and therefore … is best understood by analytical ways of thinking commonly applied to other forms of text. For example, books.

This way of looking at DNA as a book made sense. Narby clearly says we can learn to read DNA. By implication, he suggests we can learn to write—or rewrite—the genetic code.

An alternative way to conceptualize what I am calling “rewriting” is to imagine that DNA contains a subtext resembling a series of footnotes that can be scrolled up onscreen.

In this scenario, no rewriting or reprogramming is required. The program for our new and improved bioenergy blueprint already exists in what mainstream genetics has dismissed as “junk” DNA.

Most geneticists have admitted they have little idea why over ninety percent of our DNA even exists. The majority of DNA appears to be nonsense. A lot of it is in the form of palindromes, puzzling sentences that read the same forward and backward.

“Junk” DNA consists primarily of “introns,” considered noncoding genetic sequences, as opposed to “exons” that have an identifiable coding function in building our protein structures through RNA transcription.

In other words, as shown in the figure below, exons clearly do something, while introns supposedly do not.

Fortunately, some who have asked how nature could be so inefficient are beginning to rethink this dogma that ultimately raises more questions than it answers.

Recent research has shed light on intense epigenetic as well as “meta-genetic” activity in “junk” DNA, which appears to have much more to do with creating a specific species than previously thought.

For example, if we only look at the small portion of DNA composed of exons, perhaps you have heard there is little difference, genetically speaking, between a human being and a fruit fly? There is also practically nothing at the level of exons that distinguishes one human being from another.

Others who have studied the mystery of “junk” DNA have concluded that the as little as three percent of the human genome thought to be behind protein transcription does not contain enough information to assemble any kind of body.

Faced with this mystifying scenario, more and more scientists are paying attention to curious structures called “jumping DNA,” or transposons, found in the supposedly useless ninety-seven percent of the DNA molecule.

In 1983 Barbara McClintock was awarded the Nobel Prize for discovering transposons. She and fellow biologists coined the term “jumping DNA” for good reason, notes David Wilcock, as “these one million different proteins can break loose from one area, move to another area, and thereby rewrite the DNA code.”

Clearly, “junk” DNA was prematurely dismissed. In an article entitled “The Unseen Genome” published in Scientific American, Dr. John Mattick is quoted as saying that the failure to recognize the importance of introns (to say nothing of transposons) in “junk” DNA “may well go down as one of the biggest mistakes in the history of molecular biology.”

Leigh and I propose that we rename “junk” DNA potential DNA and understand it as the our “ener-genetic” interface with the bioenergy blueprint.

It is accurate to say that DNA is a form of text with its own alphabet, and that we can use linguistic means to rewrite DNA, in the process activating an ener-genetic “reset program” designed to turn our introns into exons (via transposons) and create new protein transcription sequences capable of leading to regeneration, or re-gene-ration.

Potentiation employs particular combinations of vowel-based sounds paired with linguistic thought (light) codes that are transmitted to the recipient’s potential DNA—initiating a domino effect of repatterning that resets the bioenergy blueprint to harmonic functioning.

Here, I am coming from a perspective that views light and thought as equivalent energies. The new physics, as well, explains that the act of thinking produces electrical currents that generate torsion waves of light, much as audible sound waves produce torsion waves of sound.

Potentiation safely and permanently stimulates DNA without fundamentally altering the individual’s basic genetics by simply activating a reset potential that already exists. For more specifics on how this works, read our FAQ.

The session, a one-time event, takes just thirty minutes. The resultant shifts surface in the weeks and months following as the bioenergy blueprint repatterns.

For some these shifts are felt dramatically, for others they flow into a subtle upswing. The entire process takes just over nine months (42 weeks) to complete: interestingly, a human gestation cycle.